tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21628316.post4599586929246917349..comments2023-10-18T05:54:58.700-04:00Comments on Network Weaving: The Network LeapJackhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18317757979125496981noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21628316.post-43382487025321996452009-11-04T07:08:32.071-05:002009-11-04T07:08:32.071-05:00Nice post Holley, enjoyed your thoughts...Nice post Holley, enjoyed your thoughts...jane bushhttp://www.exporttouk.net/Market-Entry-Strategic-Planning.htmnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21628316.post-26205439456881475342009-03-03T01:24:00.000-05:002009-03-03T01:24:00.000-05:00Hi,FYI, please check out the work of Edgar Cahn, s...Hi,<BR/>FYI, please check out the work of Edgar Cahn, see "Introducing the core economy and co-production",<BR/>http://tbmw.org/CoreEconCoProd<BR/><BR/>Cahn says, Co-Production requires A partnership on two levels: between professionals and those that they serve And between two economies: the monetary economy and the core economy<BR/><BR/>Best Regards,<BR/>Tony BudakAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21628316.post-49821745790683785642009-03-02T20:18:00.000-05:002009-03-02T20:18:00.000-05:00I couldn't agree more, although I don't think that...I couldn't agree more, although I don't think that this is the only barrier to networking plans between non-profits. Part of it is a simple lack of connectivity. Groups are only becoming aware of each other via the web, twitter, facebook pages, etc. <BR/><BR/>However, the disconnect you point towards is indeed a large element in lack of engagement. Instead of competing for dwindling funding and other resources, its time for groups to go back to old fashioned asset mapping that is careful to include "clients" and "competitors" as stakeholders.telerisghosthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05338820037993915615noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21628316.post-57028504099323336542009-03-02T13:14:00.000-05:002009-03-02T13:14:00.000-05:00June, there are two issues mingled in this post. T...June, there are two issues mingled in this post. The first is an important one about the power dynamic between "giver" and "receiver" where we have historically honored the one with money. I totally agree that we need to shift this, and I am actively working on conversations to evolve our thinking here. First, the philanthropic relationship needs to be perceived as mutual empathy and mutual opportunity, I believe.<BR/><BR/>The second issue is whether "donors" of money pay attention to the boundaries of organizations (and particular projects) or the boundaries of energy (and the evolution of resilient innovative networks). Also, a vital and evolving area. I would love to hear more on this, from your perspective! Can you explain further? Thanks!NurtureGirlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14212159709973868878noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-21628316.post-49490585036435045072009-02-26T14:38:00.000-05:002009-02-26T14:38:00.000-05:00Absolutely!! Network value is a two-way street, a...Absolutely!! Network value is a two-way street, and orgnizations and funders must focus both on what they can get from and give to a network ... creating a collective value that makes the network so much greater than the sum of its parts.<BR/><BR/>Thanks for the great post!<BR/><BR/>Jennifer :)<BR/>The Rurban FringeAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com